TOGAF ADM Framework Design at Private Insurance Company PT Tugu Pratama

Tiara Anindita; Muhammad Qomarul  Huda

Authors

Tiara Anindita Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Author
Muhammad Qomarul Huda Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Author

Keywords:

TOGAF, ADM, Enterprise Architecture, Business Process., Information Technology

Abstract

This study aims to design an Enterprise Architecture (AE) using the TOGAF ADM (Architecture Development Method) framework for insurance companies, with a focus on improving operational efficiency, regulatory compliance, and customer experience. TOGAF ADM was chosen because of its ability to provide a structured and comprehensive approach to developing an architecture that is aligned with business objectives and technology needs. This research method involves analyzing business needs, mapping key business processes such as claim submission, insurance registration, promotion, customer service, and identifying supporting technologies such as HRD, finance and IT services. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of TOGAF ADM can help insurance companies integrate systems, improve data security, and ensure compliance with industry regulations. In addition, this design also supports product and service innovation, and increases the scalability and flexibility of the architecture to face market dynamics. However, this study also identified several limitations, including implementation complexity, significant resource requirements, and challenges in integrating legacy systems. Overall, the TOGAF ADM AE design offers a strong framework for the digital transformation of insurance companies, with the potential for positive impacts on operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and business competitiveness.

References

1. Abubakre, M., Zhou, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2022). The impact of information technology culture and personal innovativeness in information technology on digital entrepreneurship success. Information Technology & People, 35(1), 204-231.

2. Abunadi, I. (2019). Enterprise architecture best practices in large corporations. Information, 10(10), 293.

3. Amalia, E., & Supriadi, H. (2017, June). Development of enterprise architecture in university using TOGAF as framework. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1855, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

4. Bhattacharya, P. (2018). Aligning enterprise systems capabilities with business strategy: An extension of the strategic alignment model (SAM) using enterprise architecture. Procedia computer science, 138, 655-662.

5. Boh, W. F., & Yellin, D. (2006). Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 163-207.

6. Espinosa, J. A., Boh, W. F., & DeLone, W. (2011, January). The organizational impact of enterprise architecture: a research framework. In 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1-10). IEEE.

7. Ettahiri, I., Doumi, K., & Zellou, A. (2022, November). Towards a dynamic model of business IT alignment using enterprise architecture: a comparative study. In International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics (pp. 707-720). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

8. Fu, Q., Abdul Rahman, A. A., Jiang, H., Abbas, J., & Comite, U. (2022). Sustainable supply chain and business performance: The impact of strategy, network design, information systems, and organizational structure. Sustainability, 14(3), 1080.

9. Mehmood, T. (2021). Does information technology competencies and fleet management practices lead to effective service delivery? Empirical evidence from e-commerce industry. International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management (IJTIM), 1(2), 14-41.

10. Pulkkinen, M., & Hirvonen, A. (2005, January). EA planning, development and management process for agile enterprise development. In Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 223c-223c). IEEE.

11. Rouhani, B. D., Mahrin, M. N. R., Nikpay, F., Ahmad, R. B., & Nikfard, P. (2015). A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies. information and Software Technology, 62, 1-20.

12. Saleem, F., & Fakieh, B. (2020). Enterprise architecture and organizational benefits: A cASE sTUDY. Sustainability, 12(19), 8237.

13. Saputra, H., Gustiana, I., & Soeryanto Soegoto, E. (2022). Design of enterprise information system using TOGAF framework for public service agency. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17(4).

14. Setyowati, W., Widayanti, R., & Supriyanti, D. (2021). Implementation of e-business information system in indonesia: Prospects and challenges. International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management, 1(2), 180-188.

15. Suseno, Y., & Abbott, L. (2021). Women entrepreneurs' digital social innovation: Linking gender, entrepreneurship, social innovation and information systems. Information Systems Journal, 31(5), 717-744.

16. Ulmi, U., Putra, A. P. G., Ginting, Y. D. P., Laily, I. L., Humani, F., & Ruldeviyani, Y. (2020, July). Enterprise architecture planning for enterprise university information system using the TOGAF architecture development method. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 879, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing.

17. Van der Raadt, B., Bonnet, M., Schouten, S., & Van Vliet, H. (2010). The relation between EA effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(10), 1954-1969.

18. Ward JM, Peppard J. 2002. Strategic Planning for Information Systems. 3th ed. United Kingdom (UK): J Wiley.

19. Yurisca, B. D., Kevin, C., Agustinus, C., & Adrian, P. (2020). Design enterprise architecture in forwarding company using togaf method. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 8(8), 79-83