Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

Introduction

International Journal of Economics and Business (IJEB) is an online platform that provides facilities for Students, Researchers, Multidisciplinary, Engineers, and Professionals to publish high-quality papers that have gone through a review process according to research principles. This journal publishes original research, surveys, and review papers on Management, Marketing, Business, Finance, SMEs, Entrepreneurship from all over the world. IJEB covers comprehensive cutting-edge trends of economics and business research and will be published quarterly in February, May, August, and November

General Guidelines

General guidelines for writing in International Journal of Economics and Business (IJEB) are as follows :

  1. Written in English
  2. The length of submitted paper is at least 6 pages and no maximum pages.
  3. Make sure that your paper is prepared using the in International Journal of Economics and Business (IJEB) Template (Latex or docx) and Copyright Transfer Form when if it accepted
  4. At least 20 references with 80% coming from the original research article (Journal)
  5. Willing to make improvements at the pre-review stage, a maximum of 10 days after the pre-review was carried out

Guidelines for The Manuscript Body Text

Scientific articles will be published in the International Journal of Economics and Business (IJEB) must follow the rules of writing on the paper body. The rules follow the pattern of IMRAD (Introduction, Method, Result, and Discussion) added the last section is conclusion section.

Title: The title should be concise and indicate the identity of the subject, the research objectives, and keywords. Titles may be no longer than 100 characters.

Author name: The author's name without academic degrees and not preceded by the word "by" followed by the name of the institution, address of institution and contact email.

Abstract: Abstract should describe the entire content of the article with maximum of 250 word. It is not allowed references to figures and tables.  it is written in a straightforward, concise, and must include:

  • Background (optional, one or two sentence)
  • Research objective
  • Method
  • Result
  • Conclusion

Keyword: Use keywords can describe the content of article. It is written in 3 to 5 words.

Introduction: Basically, in the introduction provides general background research, literature review (state of the art), originality of research (gap analysis), and research objectives. In the literature review, there are at least five articles reviewed briefly that can justify the novelty of the research.

Method: In the methods section provides a summary of the methods used, such as the subjects studied, tools and materials used, model or design used, sampling technique, the measured variable, analysis and statistical models used.

Result: In the results section contains the presentation of the results of research can be illustrated using tables or figures to clarify the presentation of the results verbally. The data presented is data that is processed, not raw data.

Discussion: Material discussion mainly concerned, whether the results are consistent with the hypothesis or not, and put forward the argument.

Conclusion: write the conclusions of the research that has been done and future works. The conclusion must answer the purpose of the study or hypothesis. Write the conclusion briefly and clearly. Do not discuss again at the conclusion. Do not use Bullet / Numbering.

The Guidelines for Citations and References

IMPORTANT

All reference citations are from and written in international language (English).

Comparison of the number of citations 70 percent in international language and 30 other languages

APA citations. Please ensure that all information in your manuscript that is taken from another source is substantiated with an in-text reference citation. The publisher will return your submission to you for correction if you do not properly format your references. For more information and examples on APA citations.

The following rules for handling work by a single author or multiple authors apply to all APA-style references in your reference list, regardless of the type of work (book, article, electronic resource, etc.)

Single Author

List the author’s last name first, followed by the author’s initials. For example: Fowler, R. B.

  • “Fowler, R. B. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10”

Two Authors

List authors by their last names and initials. Use an ampersand (&) instead of "and," and include a comma between them. For example: Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E.

  • “Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66, 1034-1048”

Three to Twenty Authors

List authors by their last names and initials. Use commas to separate author names, while the last author’s name is preceded again by an ampersand. For example: Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., Harlow, T., & Bach, J. S.

  • “Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., Harlow, T., Bach, J. S., Next, U., Thomas, I., March, K., Bishard, K., Leister, I., Ulrich, H., Brehm, M., Frey, K., Isi, M., Mel, S., Ano, D., Karatzas, K., Mart, Q., & Stevens, C. (1993). There's more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204”

More Than Twenty Authors

List the last names and initials of the first nineteen authors, separated by commas. An ellipsis (. . .) will then be used, followed by the final author’s last name and initials. Never use et al. in a reference citation. For example: Miller, F. H., Choi, M. J., Angeli, L. L., Harland, A. A., Stamos, J. A., Thomas, S. T., . . . Rubin, L. H.

  • “Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., Harlow, T., Bach, J. S., Next, U., Thomas, I., March, K., Bishard, K., Leister, I., Ulrich, H., Brehm, M., Frey, K., Isi, M., Mel, S., Ano, D., Karatzas, K., Mart, Q., ... Rubin, L. H. (2009). Web site usability for the blind and low-vision user. Technical Communication, 57, 323-335”

Author with a Suffix (Jr., Sr., etc.)

When an author has a suffix as part of their name, such as Jr. (junior) or Sr. (senior), the suffix will appear after the initials of the author. A comma separates the initials from the suffix. For example: Downey, R., Jr.

  • “Downey, R., Jr. (Actor). (2013). Iron man 3. Marvel Studios”

Organization as Author

When a book or article is written by an organization, the organization’s name takes the place of the author’s. Do not abbreviate. For example: American Psychological Association.

  • “American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Author”

Unknown Author

When the author’s name is unknown, the title of the source will take the place of the author’s name.

  • “Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary (10th ed.). (1993). Merriam-Webster”

Submission Preparation Checklist

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • Have at least 20 references with 80% of original research article (Journals)
  • Use references published on the last 5 years
  • Use reference manager e.g. Mendeley or others when managing the references
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 10-point font; employs tahoma, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • Add all authors and complete affiliation in the metadata
  • Willing to make improvements at the pre-review stage, a maximum of 14 days after the pre-review was carried out

Articles

Section default policy

Privacy Statement

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

Here are the deal and ethical standards for all parties involved in scientific publications, such as editor, reviewer, and author. As such, this journal follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers  that has been written on the http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.

DUTIES OF EDITORS

Editor of the Journal of Infotel is responsible for taking decisions manuscripts will be published in the Journal of Infotel. The editor can be guided by the policy of the editorial board and constrained by the requirements of applicable laws regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can discuss with other editors or reviewer in making this decision.

Fair Play

Editors will evaluate the manuscripts in accordance with the intellectual content without regard to race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of the author

Confidentiality

The Editor and editorial staff should not provide any information about  a submitted manuscript to someone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Conflict of interest

The materials that are not published in a submitted manuscript may not be used for the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

DUTIES OF REVIEWER

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The review process may assist the auditor in making editorial decisions and through the communication between editor with the author will assist the author in improving the manuscript.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Each manuscript has been accepted for review must be treated as confidential documents. The manuscript should not be shown or discussed with others except with permission from the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

The review should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not allowed. Reviewers must show clearly the results of the assessment along with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material contained in the manuscript must not be used for the reviewer's own research without the written permission of the author. Special information and ideas obtained through a review process should be kept confidential and not used for personal purposes. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts that have a conflict of interest due to a script that is competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with one of the authors, or a company involved with the script.

DUTIES OF AUTHOR

Reporting Standard

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The main data to be represented accurately in the script. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references that allow others to do the research again. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

The author was asked to provide the raw data associated with the text for editorial review process and should be prepared to provide public access to such data , if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in  more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of  interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published work

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.