Bridging Geographic and Academic Distances: Evaluation of a Web-Conference Training for Linguistics Graduate Students Globally
Keywords:
Web-Conferencing, Synchronous Online Training, Academic Digital Literacy, Graduate Students, International Collaborative Learning, Saudi Arabian Higher EducationAbstract
This case study research evaluated a series of training web-conferencing initiatives designed to address the academic challenges and geographic isolation faced by Saudi Arabian linguistics graduate students spread across multiple countries (Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Saudi Arabia). Organized by the Saudi Linguistics Society (SAL)—a volunteer-initiated and managed student organization—the program aimed to: (1) enhance electronic literature search skills, (2) introduce current trends in linguistics research, and (3) facilitate networking with international experts. With a limited budget, the study utilized various free online conferencing platforms (such as Skype and WebEx) and collected data through participant surveys and technical log analysis. Findings indicate that despite technical challenges such as unstable connection quality and a lack of initial technical support, participants unanimously rated the experience as highly beneficial. Key benefits identified included significant development of research competencies, creation of constructive collaborative learning spaces, and cost and time efficiencies. The study concludes that web-conferencing is an effective and feasible synchronous training tool, particularly in resource-constrained contexts. As a recommendation, this study suggests the importance of adequate technical support, integration of asynchronous activities for immersion, and advocacy for institutional and financial support from the government and universities to scale and synergize this kind of collaborative learning model in the higher education environment of Saudi Arabia and other developing countries.
Downloads
References
1. Alam, M. A. (2023). From teacher-centered to student-centered learning: The role of constructivism and connectivism in pedagogical transformation. Journal of Education, 11(2), 154-167.
2. Anderson Jr, E. G., Chandrasekaran, A., Davis-Blake, A., & Parker, G. G. (2018). Managing distributed product development projects: Integration strategies for time-zone and language barriers. Information Systems Research, 29(1), 42-69.
3. Aravamuthan, B., Landsness, E. C., & Silbermann, E. (2021). ANA Webinars: implementation of a conference‐based virtual networking event. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 8(2), 525-528.
4. Basmanova, A. A., Grunina, Y. A., & Kargovskaya, E. A. (2020). Digital Learning: Students’ Assessment of Webinars and Web Conferences as a Tool for Acquiring Knowledge and Skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6960-6966.
5. Booth, J., Coldwell, M., Müller, L. M., Perry, E., & Zuccollo, J. (2021). Mid-career teachers: A mixed methods scoping study of professional development, career progression and retention. Education Sciences, 11(6), 299.
6. Chipps, W., Petzold, A., Adams, C., & Jackson, K. (2022). Online therapeutic methods: A systematic review. Current Psychology, 41(5), 2835-2847.
7. Crucho, C. I., Avó, J., Diniz, A. M., & Gomes, M. J. (2020). Challenges in teaching organic chemistry remotely. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3211-3216.
8. Doo, M. (2006). A problem in online interpersonal skills training: Do learners practice skills? Open Learning, 21(3), 263-272.
9. Ebner, C., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2019, September). Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: a meta-analysis. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 4, p. 92). Frontiers Media SA.
10. Fleming, J. (2021). Best Practices for Web-Conferencing and Webinars: Exploring the Efficacy of Web Technology (Webinars) by Learner and School Characteristics. In Curriculum Development and Online Instruction for the 21st Century (pp. 91-113). IGI Global.
11. Garlinska, M., Osial, M., Proniewska, K., & Pregowska, A. (2023). The influence of emerging technologies on distance education. Electronics, 12(7), 1550.
12. Gegenfurtner, A., Zitt, A., & Ebner, C. (2020). Evaluating webinar‐based training: a mixed methods study of trainee reactions toward digital web conferencing. International Journal of Training and Development, 24(1), 5-21.
13. Hardman, V., Sasse, M. A., & Kouvelas, I. (1998). Successful multiparty audio communication over the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 41(5), 74-80.
14. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2003). Models to evaluate online learning communities of asynchronous discussion forums. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2).
15. Hill, T. G., Langley, J. E., Kervin, E. K., Pesut, B., Duggleby, W., & Warner, G. (2021). An integrative review on the feasibility and acceptability of delivering an online training and mentoring module to volunteers working in community organizations. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 688982.
16. Kasch, J., Bootsma, M., Schutjens, V., van Dam, F., Kirkels, A., Prins, F., & Rebel, K. (2023). Experiences and perspectives regarding challenge-based learning in online sustainability education. Emerald Open Research, 1(3).
17. Kolås, L., Nordseth, H., & Yri, J. S. (2015). Active Students in Webinars. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
18. Lieser, P., Taff, S. D., & Murphy-Hagan, A. (2018). The webinar integration tool: A framework for promoting active learning in blended environments. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1), 7-7.
19. Lindquist, E. (2024). Teaching public policy to mid-career MPA students: Recalibrating the online balance. In Handbook of teaching public policy (pp. 64-74). Edward Elgar Publishing.
20. Maher, D., & Prescott, A. (2017). Professional development for rural and remote teachers using video conferencing. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(5), 520-538.
21. Molnar, A. (2015). Virtual Schools in the US 2015: Politics, Performance, Policy, and Research Evidence. National Education Policy Center.
22. Momani, F., Hatamleh, A. A., Hamzah, W. M. A. F. W., Jusoh, J. A., Zakaria, M. D., & Das, S. (2023, October). E-Learning: A Successful Learning Environment. In 2023 International Conference on Computer Science and Emerging Technologies (CSET) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
23. Munna, M. S. H., Hossain, M. R., & Saylo, K. R. (2024). Digital education revolution: Evaluating LMS-based learning and traditional approaches. Journal of Innovative Technology Convergence, 6(2).
24. Pedaste, M., & Kasemets, M. (2021). Challenges in organizing online conferences. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 92-104.
25. Petrova, N. N., Sidorenko, L. P., Absalyamova, S. G., & Sakhapov, R. L. (2017, September). Efficiency and prospects of webinars as a method of interactive communication in the humanities. In Online Engineering & Internet of Things: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation REV 2017, held 15-17 March 2017, Columbia University, New York, USA (pp. 940-948). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
26. Russell, C. K., Burchum, J. R., Likes, W. M., Jacob, S., Graff, J. C., Driscoll, C., ... & Cowan, P. (2008). WebQuests: creating engaging, student-centered, constructivist learning activities. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 26(2), 78-87.
27. Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (1993). Recruiter perceptions of applicant fit: Implications for individual career preparation and job search behavior. Journal of Vocational behavior, 43(3), 310-327.
28. Salazar, D., Aguirre-Munoz, Z., Fox, K., & Nuanez-Lucas, L. (2010). On-line professional learning communities: Increasing teacher learning and productivity in isolated rural communities. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 8(4), 1-7.
29. Shannon, S., Francis, R., & Torpey, G. (2012, November). Barriers to adoption of blended learning and online feedback and assessment by sessional staff. In Proceedings of The 46th Annual Conference of the Architectual Science Association (ANZAcA), Gold Coast, Australia: Griffith University (pp. 14-16).
30. Sunasee, R. (2020). Challenges of teaching organic chemistry during COVID-19 pandemic at a primarily undergraduate institution. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3176-3181.
31. Szabo, Z., & Schwartz, J. (2011). Learning methods for teacher education: The use of online discussions to improve critical thinking. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 79-94.
32. Willse, C. (2024). State education agency governance, virtual learning, and student privacy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Policy, 38(1), 186-217.
33. Yücel, Ü. A., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 97, 31-48.
34. Zoumenou, V., Sigman-Grant, M., Coleman, G., Malekian, F., Zee, J. M., Fountain, B. J., & Marsh, A. (2015). Identifying best practices for an interactive webinar. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 107(2), 62-69.
